Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Riley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1927No. Docket No. 5900Published

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

-This proceeding in rna~damu~ was instituted on behalf of San Benito County for the purpose of requiring the State Controller to deliver certain state warrants for the payment of the total sum' of $4,876.90, constituting the county’s share of the state “Motor Vehicle Fund” collected by the state under the Motor Vehicle Act (Stats. 1923, p. 568). It is a proceeding identical in its nature to and involves the same main legal question presented in the one entitled “County of San Benito, Plaintiff, v. Ray L. Riley, as Controller of the State of California, Defendant,” numbered 5899, ante, p. 131…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corbett v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. County of San Benito v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API