Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allen v. Estate of Juddine

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2010No. 1090854Published

1ConcurrenceBolin, Justice

I concur fully with the main opinion. I write specially to note the in rem nature of a probate proceeding involving a decedent’s estate.

As a former probate judge, I am well aware that often after the administration of an intestate’s estate is begun in the probate court and letters of administration are granted, a purported last will and testament of the decedent is located and filed for probate. In that scenario, a fiduciary/personal representative for the estate— the administrator — serves until the will is admitted to probate and letters testamentary are granted. At that time, a new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Kaplan v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Ex Parte WalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Caverno v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. McCann v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API