Legal Opinion · Dissent

Runewicz v. Keystone Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 631Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Price, J.:

This appeal follows a lower court order confirming an arbitration award in favor of appellees against appellant. I would affirm the order of the lower court.

Appellees, Joseph and Nellie Runewicz, purchased automobile insurance from appellant, Keystone Insurance Company. Included in their policy was uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of $10,000 as required by statute.1 The policy also provided for common law arbitration of any differences which might arise between insured and insurer.

On February 12, 1968, Nellie Runewicz was injured in an automobile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Press v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. American Arbitration Ass'n AwardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Levin v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API