Legal Opinion

Purcell v. . Jaycox

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence clearly established that Holbrook, the carman of the defendants, had general authority to receive for them all goods directed to them and arriving at the Binghamton railroad depot at Syracuse. That his authority was recognized by the railroad company and goods were delivered to him without any special order from the defendants and he always receipted for the goods so delivered to him, and that the defendants were in the habit of settling monthly with the railroad company for the freight upon all goods thus received by Holbrook. Also that the deliveries to him included returned…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. National Bank of WaupacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Carroll v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API