Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blakesley v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 1921Published

Appeal from Taylor District Court. — Hiram ~K. Evans, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. Verdiet and judgment for the plaintiff and defendant appeals.-—

1ConcurrenceWeaver, J.

I concur in the conclusion that a new trial must be ordered, because I think theipeculiar condition of the record indicates that substantial justice will best be accomplished by a retrial which will not be complicated by the injection of an issue upon which there is no evidence. I do not agree that, as a matter of law, there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, or that, as a matter of law, plaintiff is chargeable with contributory negligence. I think there is competent evidence that the truck body was left *322in the street, and that the plats and maps put in evidence do not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lovell v. DeBardelaben Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Potera v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McEldon ex rel. Munch v. DrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Briese v. MaechtleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API