Legal Opinion

Patrice Murphy v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided February 5, 2009No. 02-06-00420-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

I. Introduction

The question this court is asked to answer is whether the trial court erred by denying Appellant Patrice Murphy’s motion to dismiss based on her claim that her right to a speedy trial was violated. 1 Because Murphy did little to seek a speedy trial and because she suffered nominal personal or defense prejudice from a lengthy delay that was largely attributable to the State, we will affirm.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

On March 25, 1998, Cooke County Sheriffs Deputy Bobby Faglie was on patrol when he saw a green Jeep Cherokee leave a rest…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stanley Deon Harper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
  2. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Adrian Quigley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2017
  5. Cameron Warren v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API