Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Schlesinger

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 10, 1913Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, Leo Schlesinger, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of April, 1913, denying the plaintiff’s motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction order .granted ex parte, and also from an order entered in said clerks’ office on the 14th day of May, 1913, denying a motion for a reargument.

1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant Baldwin Schlesinger are the executors under the last will and testament of their father, Abraham Schlesinger, who died on the 18th day of January, 1898; and Mark Schlesinger, whose administratrix is a party defendant, was a legatee under the will. On or about the 15th day of July, 1910, Baldwin Schlesinger, as such executor, filed an account of the proceedings of the executors in the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, and thereafter and on the 24th day of March, 1913, a decree of the Surrogate’s Court was duly entered finally settling their accounts.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Schlesinger v. . SchlesingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API