Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brannon v. Pike

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1987No. 16396Published

1Concurrence

BISTLINE, Justice,

not joining the Court’s opinion, but concurring in the Court’s judgment affirming the district court.

I

The reason for not joining the Court’s opinion is not based on any disagreement with the conclusion that it is the Industrial Commission which should decide the issue. Note may be taken that that has been my view of the law long before this appeal. Almost all of that found in the Court’s opinion finds me in agreement.

Now, let -it be understood at the outset that if the opinion did not mention Martin *941and Thompson as standing for the proposition that the Industrial Commission…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. LittkyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Martin v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Martin v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Martin v. Robert W. Woods Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API