Legal Opinion

Reichman-Crosby Co. v. Horton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1926No. 25774PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

In the year 1923 Reichman-Crosby Company, a corporation, sued D. A. Horton and M. M. Horton on a note in favor of appellant, signed “Horton Lumber Co., per D. A. Horton,” alleging in the declaration that D. A. Llorton and M. M. Horton were partners doing business under the name of Horton Lumber Company. Summons were issued to D. A. Horton and M. M. Horton, on which the sheriff indorsed the following return: “I have this day executed the within writ personally by delivering a true copy of the same to the within named D. A. Horton and M. M. Horton,” signing his name to the return as sheriff. No…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atterberry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pointer v. HuffmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Peterson v. PetersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lampton-Reid Co. v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Mullins v. LabahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API