Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 1975No. 125PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The sole question raised in defendant’s petition for cer-tiorari is whether the Court of Appeals erred in deciding that there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s flight after the robbery to support the following instructions of Judge James to the jury:
“Now it is contended by the State, whether the evidence shows it is for you and you alone to say, that the defendant disappeared, and was not seen for five or six days, the officer’s testimony being that he had a warrant for him and drove around through the area which he knew the defendant would normally be in, but did not see…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. MurilloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. MalachiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.