Legal Opinion

Lancaster National Bank v. Whitefield Savings Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 2, 1943No. 3389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

The real inquiry is whether the defendant acquired greater security than its mortgages furnished by means of a procedure not contested by the plaintiffs.

If the conditional judgment was valid, it enlarged the security by altering it. Instead of limiting each of the three debts to the security of a separate third interest in the real estate, as provided by the mortgages, it gave each debt proportionate security of the full title. Its effect was to establish a single composite debt secured by a single composite mortgage. It merged the debts into their aggregate as a unit and consolidated the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clough v. FowlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
  2. Lamarre v. LamarreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Lewellyn v. FollansbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  3. Coburn v. First Equity Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Jodoin v. BaroodySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API