Legal Opinion
The Przemysl
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 30, 1927No. Nos. 18953, 18954PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNS, District Judge.
By two libels of information the government prays for the forfeiture of the steel auxiliary vessel Przemysl and its cargo of alcohol and liquor. The libel against the vessel charges an alleged violation of seetion 584 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (42 Stat. 858, 980, 19 USCA § 486 [Coinp. St. § 5841h3]), because of its alleged failure to produce the manifest required of vessels bound for the United States, and also an alleged violation of section 3450, R. S. (26 USCA §§ 1181, 1182 [Comp. St. § 6352]), because of the alleged deposit and concealment on board of a commodity in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LaBauve v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- Alksne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Quaker Oats Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Anthony J. AlfonsoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.