State of Missouri, ex rel Jerry Scherschel v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCynthia L. Martin, Judge
The City of Kansas City, Missouri, (“City”) appeals a mandamus judgment directing it to comply with the Administrative Code of Kansas City by adjusting employee Jerry Scherschel’s (“Scher-schel”) pay classification and pay rate. The City argues that the trial court erred because (1) Scherschel failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he was entitled to a mandamus judgment; (2) the judgment relied on hearsay testimony; and (3) the judgment improperly awarded money damages. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural History 1
Section 906(a) of the City Charter provides that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. LeisureSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State Ex Rel. McKee v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curry Investment Company v. James B. SantilliMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Missouri ex rel. Mo. Clean Energy Dist. v. McEvoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- In the Interest of: D.A.B. and B.M.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Friends of Responsible Agriculture v. BennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Clarkson Construction Co. v. Alisa Warren, Missouri Commission on Human Rights, and Charles WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.