Legal Opinion

Harris v. Ariel Transportation Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered March 2, 2006, which denied the motion by defendants Ariel Transportation and Diop to compel service of a more responsive bill of particulars, or for an order of preclusion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she sustained personal injury in a motor vehicle accident. In response to the demand by Ariel and Diop for a bill of particulars as to the nature of her permanent injury, *309plaintiff alleged that she sustained cervical bulges at C4-C5, C5-C6 and C6-C7, but she also stated that these bulges…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Twiddy v. Standard Marine Transport Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Suits v. Wyckoff Heights Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Colwin v. Bruce Katz, M.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Smith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Smith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Charles v. SuvannavejhNew York Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API