Legal Opinion

Rinker Materials Corp. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 1995No. 94-2807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We deny this petition for a writ of certiora-ri seeking review of an order requiring Rink-er to produce a truck for testing without any provision in the order for a bond or advance payment covering costs and any potential loss incurred in the production. The order authorizes the removal of a grab bar from the truck for analysis to determine whether it is defective. The order also authorizes the random visual inspection of a sample (25) of other Rinker trucks. This random visual inspection was deemed a less expensive method of discovery than requiring production of voluminous…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Schering Corporation v. ThorntonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Dow Corning Corp. v. GarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Korneffel v. South Broward Hospital DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API