Rinker Materials Corp. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We deny this petition for a writ of certiora-ri seeking review of an order requiring Rink-er to produce a truck for testing without any provision in the order for a bond or advance payment covering costs and any potential loss incurred in the production. The order authorizes the removal of a grab bar from the truck for analysis to determine whether it is defective. The order also authorizes the random visual inspection of a sample (25) of other Rinker trucks. This random visual inspection was deemed a less expensive method of discovery than requiring production of voluminous…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Schering Corporation v. ThorntonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Dow Corning Corp. v. GarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Korneffel v. South Broward Hospital DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003