Harder v. Pfitzinger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatience D. Roggensack, J.
¶ 1. Derek Harder and Jill Harder have sought review of an order of the court of appeals dismissing their appeal for lack of jurisdiction because it was not filed within the statutorily prescribed time from the entry of the order for judgment. The Harders assert that the order for judgment was not the final order because a judgment was entered subsequently.
¶ 2. To make a timely appeal of right, a litigant must appeal from a final judgment or a final order. Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1) (2001-02). We conclude that when an order or a judgment is entered that disposes of all of the substantive issues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Fredrick v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Radoff v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. TuescherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- In Re Incorporation of Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baumeister v. Automated Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Wambolt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SchulpiusWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Sanders v. Estate of Sanders Ex Rel. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Tyler v. RiverbankWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.