Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 25, 1941No. 36650; 36651Published

1Opinion

[127] ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

[5] Appellants filed a motion for rehearing arguing vehemently that our opinion, holding that Section 1270, R.S. Mo. 1939, which provides that judgments shall be a lien upon lands for three years, did not apply to a decree establishing a mechanics' lien, was erroneous. Appellants, among other cases, cited Eyssell v. City of St. Louis, 168 Mo. 607, 68 S.W. 893. That was a case wherein the City of St. Louis obtained a judgment for special benefits charged against a lot in a condemnation proceeding. Appellants also rely much upon Hill v. Arnold, 177 S.W. 343, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Watson v. Keystone Iron-works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Fleckenstein v. BaxterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Riley's Administrator v. McCord's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  5. Eyssell v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API