Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Van Dyke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1925No. 4244PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The plaintiffs, as residents and taxpayers of Weber county, brought this action against Weber county, and its auditor and treasurer, to restrain the payment of a claim for $1,250 in favor of the Agricultural College of the state, which had been presented to and allowted by the board of county commissioners. A demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint was sustained, and the. action dismissed, from which judgment plaintiffs appealed.

The complaint alleges that in January, 1928, the defendant Weber county entered into an agreement with the Weber county farm bureau, the Agricultural College of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Simpson v. MeekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Harrington v. AtteberryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State Ex rel. Wright v. StandfordUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Hall County Farm Bureau v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Salt Lake County v. ClintonUtah Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cook v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Garfield CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Utah Technology Finance Corp. v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Earle v. Dade County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. The Best Foods, Inc. v. Christensen, State Treas.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API