Lanham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.
We reverse the trial court’s imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for appellant’s two convictions, for assaulting two victims with a firearm, which arose out of the same criminal episode. Appellant displayed, but never fired, his weapon. See State v. Sousa, 903 So.2d 923, 926 (Fla.2005); State v. Christian, 692 So.2d 889, 890-91 (Fla.1997). In addition, there was an insufficient temporal or spatial break to constitute two separate criminal episodes. See Perry v. State, 973 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Roberts v. State, 990 So.2d 671, 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Irizarry v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- State v. SousaSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Garfield Plummer v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Bonner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Toland Jerome Bonner v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018