Legal Opinion

Lanham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 2011No. 1D09-5299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.

We reverse the trial court’s imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for appellant’s two convictions, for assaulting two victims with a firearm, which arose out of the same criminal episode. Appellant displayed, but never fired, his weapon. See State v. Sousa, 903 So.2d 923, 926 (Fla.2005); State v. Christian, 692 So.2d 889, 890-91 (Fla.1997). In addition, there was an insufficient temporal or spatial break to constitute two separate criminal episodes. See Perry v. State, 973 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Roberts v. State, 990 So.2d 671, 675 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Irizarry v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. SousaSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Garfield Plummer v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Bonner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Toland Jerome Bonner v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API