Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Ramirez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1996No. 0163-95Published

1DissentBaird, Judge

On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals held applicant’s second prosecution for the offense of involuntary manslaughter which arose out of the same criminal transaction was not jeopardy barred by art. I, § 14 of the Texas Constitution. Ramirez v. State, 895 S.W.2d 405 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1994). We granted applicant’s petition for discretionary review to determine the correctness of that holding. Following our grant of review, the parties briefed the issue, and traveled to Austin from El Paso and presented oral argument before this Court. Today, the majority dismisses applicant’s petition,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API