Legal Opinion

Helms v. Powell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1977No. 7620SC652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Did the trial court err in concluding that petitioner is not eligible for a limited driving privilege? We answer in the negative.

G.S. 20-138 provides that:

“(a) It is unlawful and punishable as provided in G.S. 20-179 for any person who is under the influence of intoxi- eating liquor to drive or operate any vehicle upon any highway or any public vehicular area within this State.
“(b) It is unlawful for any person to operate any vehicle upon any highway or any public vehicular area within this State when the amount of alcohol in such person’s blood is 0.10 percent or more by weight…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Person v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. CarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Barnhill Sanitation Service, Inc. v. Gaston CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Murray v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API