Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Mount Prospect

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1970No. 53914Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE CRAVEN

dissenting:

I cannot agree with the conclusion reached by my colleagues.

Courts are not to interfere with the discretion of legislative bodies charged with zoning and limiting the use of property except where there is a clear abuse of discretion. A zoning ordinance is clothed with a presumption of validity and it is incumbent upon one who attacks the ordinance to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, as applied to him, the ordinance is arbitrary and unreasonable and without substantial relation to the public health, morals, safety and welfare. As I view…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Northern Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Urann v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API