Legal Opinion

Gothic Watch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 18, 1947No. 7438; Entry No. 718904PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawreNCE, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement challenges the legality of certain administrative procedure. It has been carefully and thoroughly presented upon a record comprising both testimonial and documentary evidence. Stripped of nonessentials, the salient facts of the case, which are not disputed,, are here set forth in chronological order.

In December 1943 the plaintiff brought into this country from Switzerland certain watches which were entered by the importer at the invoice value in Swiss francs.

In January 1944 the United States appraiser of merchandise sent his report of value to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. Frank & LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
  2. United States v. Thalson Co.United States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Thalson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. A. Benkin, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API