Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tiryung

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1986PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

The issue in this case involves the interplay between KRS 532.030, styled “Authorized dispositions — generally,” and KRS 532.040, styled “Probation and conditional discharge.”

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement between the Commonwealth and the respondent, the respondent plead guilty and was convicted of reduced charges of Wanton Endangerment I, Wanton Endangerment II (reduced from Wanton Endangerment I), and Receiving Stolen Property Under $100 (reduced from Receiving Stolen Property Over $100). The written recommendation of the prosecutor on the plea of guilty agreement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCulley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Hord v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. Cole v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tiryung v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  2. Yates v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. MacHniak v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Myers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wlodarczyk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API