Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Thurlow

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 2011No. 33969Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge GUTIERREZ,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in sections 11(A) and 11(B) and respectfully dissent in section 11(C) of the majority opinion based on the Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Window,, 150 Idaho 873, 253 P.3d 310 (2011).

As the majority notes in Window,, the Idaho Supreme Court held that a sentencing court may impose a determinate life sentence based solely upon the nature and gravity of the offense. Id. at 876, 253 P.3d at 313. The Court further held that a defendant’s potential for rehabilitation may also be considered, but reiterated that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. WindomIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API