Legal Opinion

State v. Harper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1984No. 84-448PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

Ernest Harper appeals from an order entered by the district court for Douglas County, Nebraska, denying his request for post conviction relief sought pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3001 et seq. (Reissue 1979). Specifically, Harper maintains that because his trial counsel failed to object to the introduction of evidence of a subsequent crime admittedly committed by Harper in Iowa, he was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of his constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court was correct in denying Harper’s request…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. LeadinghorseNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Petition of Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ernest C. Harper v. Crispus Nix, Robert M. SpireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. DitterNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. FriesNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API