Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1994No. CR 94-398PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

James Edward Smith was convicted of rape, kidnapping and breaking or entering, and he received a cumulative sentence of forty years imprisonment. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence regarding his kidnapping conviction, and further argues that the court’s application of Arkansas’s new bifurcation sentencing laws, Acts 535 and 551 of 1993 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-4-103 (Repl. 1993) and 16-97-101 — 103 (Supp. 1993) violated his federal and state constitutional protections against ex-post facto laws.

First, we dispose of Smith’s constitutional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summerlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Hewitt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Singleton-Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Smith v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API