Legal Opinion
Kirsten Seidle, as Administratrix of the Estate of Tamara Wilson-Seidle, et al. v. Neptune Township et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 28, 2026No. 3:17-cv-04428Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY KIRSTEN SEIDLE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Tamara Wilson-Seidle, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-4428 (RK) (JBD) v. OPINION NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP et al., Defendants. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Motion to Vacate, Modify, or Reverse Interlocutory Order1 (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Kirsten Seidle, individually and as administratrix of decedent’s estate; T.S., M.S., and S.S., minors by their guardian Kirsten Seidle; and Philip Jr., John, Christopher, Monica, and Dorothy Seidle (“Plaintiffs”).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Joan Mullin v. Karen BalickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.