Legal Opinion
Fisher v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 11, 1986No. BF-496PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Fisher appeals, contending the trial court imposed an illegal sentence because it is in violation of section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983), under the rationale of Easton v. State, 472 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). This court recently rejected the reasoning of Easton in Pittman v. State, 492 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Accordingly, we are compelled to AFFIRM.
SMITH, WENTWORTH and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Easton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heuring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Heuring v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989