Legal Opinion

Trotcky v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Charles Trotcky, an infant, by Samuel M. Trotcky, his guardian ad litem, against the Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry Railroad Company, for personal injuries. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made on the minutes, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for a personal injury, caused, as it is alleged, by the negligence of the defendant’s employes. On the 17th of July, 1891, between 11 and 'and 12 o’clock A. M., the plaintiff, then but two years and three months old, was run over by one of defendant’s horse cars, and *1055suffered the loss of his right arm. The plaintiff resided, with Ms-parents, on the third floor of Ho. 579 Grand street. His maternal grandmother occupied the ground floor of this number as a cigar store. At about 11 o’clock of the day of the accident the plaintiff’s, mother took him…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perham v. CottleNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. White v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Bologna v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1900
  4. Devonshire v. Stubbs, New York County Courts1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API