Emanuel Pea v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a conviction of second degree murder and assault with a dangerous weapon. A detective questioned him and got a confession while he was under arrest and lying wounded in a hospital. In keeping with the spirit of Rule 5(b), F.R.Crim.P., we might have expected that the detective would have warned him of his right to remain silent. The record does not show whether the detective did so. It does not show that either the prosecution or the defense “sought to ventilate the is sue.” In these circumstances we cannot reverse. Hawkins v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 338,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elmer R. Hawkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Emanuel Pea, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Nathaniel Clifton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- MacEo Hutcherson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Hicks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.