Legal Opinion

Triplett v. St Amour

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1993No. 94059, (Calendar No. 4 April)Published

1Opinion of the Court

444 Mich. 170 (1993)

507 N.W.2d 194

TRIPLETT

v.

ST AMOUR

Docket No. 94059, (Calendar No. 4 April).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued March 31, 1993.

Decided September 28, 1993.

Fordney, Cady, Mastromarco & Jahn (by Victor J. Mastromarco, Jr., and Jo Ellen O'Connor) for the plaintiffs.

Sumpter, Perry & McDonald, P.C. (by Thomas E. McDonald), for the defendants.

BOYLE, J.

The plaintiffs, composed of the alleged tortfeasor[1] in a previous action, his employer, and its insurer, have brought an independent action at law for fraud seeking money damages issuing from a fraudulently induced settlement agreement.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API