Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Spilnyk

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 2, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The court was without jurisdiction to assess

penalties under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) for a period greater than twelve months prior to the commencement of the action, even though the Statute of Limitations was not pleaded (Lindner v. Miracle Realty Corp., N. Y. L. J., Oct. 18, 1947, p. 924, col. 7 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Thompson v. Taylor, 62 F. Supp. 930; Bowles v. Babcock, 65 F. Supp. 380).

It was error, too, for the court to have considered the area rent attorney’s interpretation in resolving the facts of this case.

The judgment should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1945
  2. Bowles v. BabcockDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kravitz v. NankinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API