Legal Opinion

State v. Barros

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2002No. 23755Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 P.3d 584 (2002)

98 Hawai`i 337

STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Robert T. BARROS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 23755.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

June 20, 2002.

Cindy A.L. Goodness, Deputy Public Defender, on the briefs, for defendant-appellant.

Donn Fudo, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, on the briefs, for plaintiff-appellee.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and RAMIL, JJ.; with ACOBA, J., concurring separately and dissenting.

Opinion of the Court by RAMIL, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant-appellant Robert Barros appeals from a circuit court judgment of conviction for promoting a dangerous drug in the third…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API