Sewell v. Sewell

(dissenting)—I find myself unable to agree with the conclusion of the majority, and uncertain whether I can go as far as Judge Simpson goes in the broad grounds of his dissent. He discusses cases dealing generally with the jurisdiction of the supreme court after an appeal has been perfected. I prefer not to deal with that general question, but to confine my research and conclusions on this occasion to the narrow question presented as to the rights and remedies of parties affected by an order of the superior court relative to the custody of children after an appeal has been perfected therefrom.