Dixon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals his sentence as a violent career criminal to forty years in prison with a thirty-year mandatory minimum. We reverse and remand for resen-tencing because the defendant did not qualify as a violent career criminal.
For a defendant to qualify as a violent career criminal, a court must find, among other things, that the primary felony offense for which the defendant is to be sentenced was committed “[wjithin 5 years after the conviction of the last prior enumerated felony, or within 5 years after the defendant’s release from a prison sentence ... that is imposed as a result…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Gorham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- KERN R. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- KERN R. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- ROD LEE BRUCE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019