Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 2010No. 4D08-3652PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals his sentence as a violent career criminal to forty years in prison with a thirty-year mandatory minimum. We reverse and remand for resen-tencing because the defendant did not qualify as a violent career criminal.

For a defendant to qualify as a violent career criminal, a court must find, among other things, that the primary felony offense for which the defendant is to be sentenced was committed “[wjithin 5 years after the conviction of the last prior enumerated felony, or within 5 years after the defendant’s release from a prison sentence ... that is imposed as a result…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Gorham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. KERN R. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. KERN R. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. ROD LEE BRUCE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API