Legal Opinion

Amsterdam v. Mandel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine two witnesses — alleged agents of defendant — before trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts disclosed by the affidavit show the existence of special circumstances entitling plaintiff to the examination. (Bloede Co. V. Devine Go., 211 App. Div. 180; Barber v. DeBruin, 253 App. Div. 909; Laruffa v. Astarita, 264 App. Div. 785.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Victor G. Bloede Co. v. J. P. Devine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Farber v. DebruinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Laruffa v. AstaritaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API