Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1940No. 4 Div. 520PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Regardless of what the law once was, it seems now definitely settled that a mere “gleam,” “glimmer,” “spark,” “the least particle,” the “smallest trace” — “a scintilla” — (all, of evidence), is not sufficient to require the guilt vel non of one accused of crime (and on trial) to be submitted to the jury — in the face of the presumption of innocence attending such a one’s plea of not guilty. Ex parte Grimmett, 228 Ala. 1, 152 So. 263; Code 1923, Sec. 7318. But that before the question of such an one’s guilt shall be submitted to the jury for its decision “there must be substantial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Austin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Bedsole v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Curlee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Porter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API