Legal Opinion
United States v. Michigan Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 12, 1926No. 217PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
This case on its facts is'similar to that of the United States v. The P. Koenig Coal Company, just decided, ante, p. 512. The indictment against the Cement Company embraces fifteen counts, and each count shows that the Cement Company, with the assistance of the Bewley Darst Coal Company, while Service Order No. 23 of the Interstate Commerce Commission was in force, obtained a billing and consignment of cars of coal by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company from a mine in Kentucky to the Municipal Light and Power Company at Four Mile Lake in Michigan, where the coal was delivered in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Avent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. HirschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Assigned Car CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Froehling Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Swetland v. Curtiss Airports CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.