Running v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice
I concur in the reversal of this case; but I regret very much to see the majority adopt by judicial legislation the doctrine of forum non conveniens in regard to transitory tort actions.1 This is the usual transitory tort action: the plaintiff is a resident of Missouri; the alleged tort occurred in Illinois; and the suit is brought in Arkansas where service was obtained on the defendant. The defendant interposed the plea of “forum non conveniens”; and this Court now sanctions that plea. I think the doctrine of forum non conveniens should not be applied to transitory tort actions, absent any…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Leonard v. . Columbia Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.