Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 1994No. 92CA1789PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this action premised on an alleged violation of the Colorado Securities Act, § 11 — 51— 101, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 4B), plaintiffs Howard Rosenthal and Rudy L. and Judy J. Bettmann appeal the judgment of dismissal entered in favor of defendants, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.; Castle Pines Land Company; Frank B. Walker; Jack A. Vickers, III; Helen McMaster Coulson; William B. Graham; Larry Reichert; and Kutak Rock & Campbell. Plaintiffs also appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion for class certification. We affirm in part, reverse in part,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Wade v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoellstorffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.