Legal Opinion

Tijerina v. Baker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1968No. 8582Published

1Opinion

MOISE, Justice, and SPIESS, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Being of the opinion that the majority has undertaken to review the actions of the district court acting as a committing magistrate as on an appeal, and has thereby-fallen into error, we express our dissent from the refusal of the court to make the writ of habeas corpus permanent as to petitioners Juan Valdez, Tobias Leyba, Reies Lopez Tijerina and Baltazar Apodaca, and to admit them to bail.

Sections 22-11-23 and 22-11-24, N.M.S. A. 1953, are referred to by the majority, but not quoted. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KonigsbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. In re LosassoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. In Re ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Day v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API