Legal Opinion
Fuller v. I. Magnin & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1951No. Civ. 14625PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Defendant I. Magnin and Company appeals from a judgment rendered against it and in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $4,612.50, the value of a diamond and platinum brooch, which belonged to plaintiffs George W. and Jane H. Fuller and was in the lawful possession of plaintiff Mrs. John Elstun at the time of its loss in defendant’s store.
Appellant claims (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support certain of the court’s findings of fact and (2) that the conclusion that appellant became and is indebted to respondents in the sum of $4,612.50 (the value of the brooch) is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bunnell v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Woodruff v. Painter & EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Copelin v. Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Jacobson v. Richards & Hassen Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Barnes v. Stern Bros.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Ellen Mae DixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Gordon H. Ball, Inc. v. ParreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kern v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- United States v. Ellen Mae DixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974