Legal Opinion
Caro v. Haywood
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 25, 1979No. 12978PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Justice.
Appellee Clyde Haywood sued appellants Luke Caro and Mae S. Caro, husband and wife, in the district court of Bastrop County asserting a claim for a liquidated money demand based upon written contract, Tex. R.Civ.P. 185 (1976), and for attorney’s fees pursuant to Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art 2226 (Supp.1978). After trial to the court, judgment was entered for appellee for $900.00 on the verified account and for attorney’s fees of $100.00.
Appellee’s petition contains the usual allegations found in a Rule 185 pleading. The “itemized and verified” account is attached to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bishop v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Larcon Petroleum, Inc. v. Autotronic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hollingsworth v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Requipco, Inc. v. Am-Tex Tank & Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Brown v. Starrett, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984