Legal Opinion

Cook v. Holbrook

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Bill in equity to reach and apply real estate in payment of a debt. In the Superior Court issues were framed for a jury, and Pitman, J., allowed a bill of exceptions, which, so far as material, appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

The object of this suit is to reach and apply in payment of the plaintiffs’ debt certain real estate conveyed by their debtor, the defendant Holbrook, to the defendant Russ. The conveyance was a voluntary one, made by said Holbrook for the benefit of his children to the defendant Russ as trustee, and the plaintiffs were pre-existing creditors.

The court gave instructions to the jury as to the legal meaning of fraud which would invalidate such a conveyance, which were not excepted to, and are presumed to be appropriate. The plaintiffs requested the court to rule that “ fraud, in a voluntary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Draper v. BuggeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Bridges v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Clark v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Mullins v. RiopelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Washburn v. HammondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API