Legal Opinion

Interstate Motor Freight System v. Service Terminals, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided May 14, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan J. Saks, J.

Motion to preclude denied. Motion to require plaintiff to post security for costs granted and all proceedings stayed until security is posted.

Plaintiff, a foreign corporation not licensed to do business in New York, is an interstate trucking company. It sues to collect a $151.40 charge for shipping goods from Arizona to defendant, a Bronx firm.

The bill of particulars already served has an annexed invoice that answers all of the demands except No. 3. Although plaintiff should have responded that it does not have the information necessary to answer No. 3…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Ohio ex rel. Fulton v. SaalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc. v. BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API