Legal Opinion
United States v. Rory Allen Meeks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1988No. 87-2375PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Rory A. Meeks appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Northern District of Iowa upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2, and 21 U.S.C. § 846. For reversal, Meeks argues that the district court erred in (1) admitting hearsay testimony under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), (2) denying his motion for directed verdict because of insufficiency of the evidence, and (3) refusing to permit him to call a witness. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Meeks was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Robert Kenneth Rich, United States of America v. Larry J. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HoelscherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Wallace Andre Jackson, United States of America v. Vaniel GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. James Edward AntwineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.