Kræutler v. President of the Bank of the United States

This case arises out of the one in which an opinion has been given this morning, between the same plaintiffs and defendants.* Robert Copland was cited as a garnishee, and required to answer sundry interrogatories, the object of which was, to ascertain if he had, or had not, in his hands, any money, goods, chattels, or assets belonging to the bank, and if *161so, how much, and particularly whether or not he had the sum of $100,000, or a sufficient amount to pay the plaintiffs’ debt.

In answer to the interrogatories, Copland stated that he had in his possession thirteen promissory notes, amounting…