Legal Opinion

Jang Hwan An v. Parra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*575Defendants failed to demonstrate their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs’ claim to recover for serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102. In opposition to defendant’s motion, plaintiffs submitted, among other things, the affidavits of their treating chiropractor, who averred that both plaintiffs had specified decreased ranges of motion in their cervical and lumbar spines, plaintiff Jang Hwan’s right knee and plaintiff Jung Book’s right shoulder. The chiropractor averred that plaintiffs’ injuries were sustained as result of the subject accident, and not the result of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suazo v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Prestol v. McKissockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Chakrani v. Beck Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McArthur v. Act Limo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API