Legal Opinion · Dissent

Benson v. Benson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 17, 2003No. 2011286Published

1DissentCrawley, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority’s decision that the trial coupt abused its discretion by failing to award the wife a portion of the equity in the marital home constitutes, in my opinion, a substitution of this court’s judgment for that of the trial court. See Ex parte Bland, 796 So.2d 340 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Wallace, 795 So.2d 719 (Ala.2000). “Trial judges enjoy broad discretion in divorce cases, and their decisions are to be overturned on appeal only when they are ‘unsupported by the evidence or [are] otherwise palpably wrong.’ ” Ex parte Bland, 796 So.2d at 344 (quoting Ex parte…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ex Parte WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API